ยซ Up

functions-in-zfc 8.9.0 Not compatible ๐Ÿ‘ผ

Context

# Packages matching: installed
# Name                # Installed # Synopsis
base-bigarray         base
base-domains          base
base-nnp              base        Naked pointers prohibited in the OCaml heap
base-threads          base
base-unix             base
conf-gmp              4           Virtual package relying on a GMP lib system installation
coq                   dev         The Coq Proof Assistant
coq-core              dev         The Coq Proof Assistant -- Core Binaries and Tools
coq-stdlib            dev         The Coq Proof Assistant -- Standard Library
coqide-server         dev         The Coq Proof Assistant, XML protocol server
dune                  3.12.2      Fast, portable, and opinionated build system
ocaml                 5.0.0       The OCaml compiler (virtual package)
ocaml-base-compiler   5.0.0       Official release 5.0.0
ocaml-config          3           OCaml Switch Configuration
ocaml-options-vanilla 1           Ensure that OCaml is compiled with no special options enabled
ocamlfind             1.9.6       A library manager for OCaml
zarith                1.13        Implements arithmetic and logical operations over arbitrary-precision integers
# opam file:
opam-version: "2.0"
maintainer: "Hugo.Herbelin@inria.fr"
homepage: "https://github.com/coq-contribs/functions-in-zfc"
license: "LGPL 2.1"
build: [make "-j%{jobs}%"]
install: [make "install"]
remove: ["rm" "-R" "%{lib}%/coq/user-contrib/FunctionsInZFC"]
depends: [
  "ocaml"
  "coq" {>= "8.9" & < "8.10~"}
]
tags: [
  "keyword: set theory"
  "keyword: Zermelo-Fraenkel"
  "keyword: functions"
  "category: Mathematics/Logic/Set theory"
  "date: April 2001"
]
authors: [
  "Carlos Simpson <carlos@math.unice.fr>"
]
bug-reports: "https://github.com/coq-contribs/functions-in-zfc/issues"
dev-repo: "git+https://github.com/coq-contribs/functions-in-zfc.git"
synopsis: "Functions in classical ZFC"
description: """
This mostly repeats Guillaume Alexandre's contribution `zf',
but in classical logic and with a different proof style. We start with a
simple axiomatization of some flavor of ZFC (for example Werner's
implementation of ZFC should provide a model).
We develop some very basic things like pairs, functions, and a little
bit about natural numbers, following the standard classical path."""
flags: light-uninstall
url {
  src: "https://github.com/coq-contribs/functions-in-zfc/archive/v8.9.0.tar.gz"
  checksum: "md5=6b065d9b2e6d203dd29f0674e1f7c87b"
}

Lint

Command
true
Return code
0

Dry install ๐Ÿœ๏ธ

Dry install with the current Coq version:

Command
opam install -y --show-action coq-functions-in-zfc.8.9.0 coq.dev
Return code
5120
Output
[NOTE] Package coq is already installed (current version is dev).
[ERROR] Package conflict!
  * No agreement on the version of coq:
    - coq >= dev
    - coq-functions-in-zfc = 8.9.0 -> coq < 8.10~
  * No agreement on the version of ocaml:
    - (invariant) -> ocaml-base-compiler = 5.0.0 -> ocaml = 5.0.0
    - coq-functions-in-zfc = 8.9.0 -> coq < 8.10~ -> ocaml < 4.05.0
    You can temporarily relax the switch invariant with `--update-invariant'
  * No agreement on the version of ocaml-base-compiler:
    - (invariant) -> ocaml-base-compiler = 5.0.0
    - coq-functions-in-zfc = 8.9.0 -> coq < 8.10~ -> ocaml < 4.05.0 -> ocaml-base-compiler = 3.08.1
  * Missing dependency:
    - coq-functions-in-zfc = 8.9.0 -> coq < 8.10~ -> ocaml < 4.05.0 -> ocaml-variants -> ocaml-beta
    unmet availability conditions: 'enable-ocaml-beta-repository'
No solution found, exiting

Dry install without Coq/switch base, to test if the problem was incompatibility with the current Coq/OCaml version:

Command
opam remove -y coq; opam install -y --show-action --unlock-base coq-functions-in-zfc.8.9.0
Return code
0

Install dependencies

Command
true
Return code
0
Duration
0 s

Install ๐Ÿš€

Command
true
Return code
0
Duration
0 s

Installation size

No files were installed.

Uninstall ๐Ÿงน

Command
true
Return code
0
Missing removes
none
Wrong removes
none