ยซ Up

higman-s 8.8.0 Not compatible ๐Ÿ‘ผ

Context

# Packages matching: installed
# Name                # Installed # Synopsis
base-bigarray         base
base-domains          base
base-nnp              base        Naked pointers prohibited in the OCaml heap
base-threads          base
base-unix             base
conf-gmp              4           Virtual package relying on a GMP lib system installation
coq                   8.17.1      The Coq Proof Assistant
coq-core              8.17.1      The Coq Proof Assistant -- Core Binaries and Tools
coq-stdlib            8.17.1      The Coq Proof Assistant -- Standard Library
coqide-server         8.17.1      The Coq Proof Assistant, XML protocol server
dune                  3.12.1      Fast, portable, and opinionated build system
ocaml                 5.1.1       The OCaml compiler (virtual package)
ocaml-base-compiler   5.1.1       Official release 5.1.1
ocaml-config          3           OCaml Switch Configuration
ocaml-options-vanilla 1           Ensure that OCaml is compiled with no special options enabled
ocamlfind             1.9.6       A library manager for OCaml
zarith                1.13        Implements arithmetic and logical operations over arbitrary-precision integers
# opam file:
opam-version: "2.0"
maintainer: "Hugo.Herbelin@inria.fr"
homepage: "https://github.com/coq-contribs/higman-s"
license: "LGPL"
build: [make "-j%{jobs}%"]
install: [make "install"]
remove: ["rm" "-R" "%{lib}%/coq/user-contrib/HigmanS"]
depends: [
  "ocaml"
  "coq" {>= "8.8" & < "8.9~"}
]
tags: [ "keyword: Higman's lemma" "keyword: well quasi-ordering" "category: Mathematics/Combinatorics and Graph Theory" "date: 2007-09-14" ]
authors: [ "William Delobel <william.delobel@lif.univ-mrs.fr>" ]
bug-reports: "https://github.com/coq-contribs/higman-s/issues"
dev-repo: "git+https://github.com/coq-contribs/higman-s.git"
synopsis: "Higman's lemma on an unrestricted alphabet"
description:
  "This proof is more or less the proof given by Monika Seisenberger in \"An Inductive Version of Nash-Williams' Minimal-Bad-Sequence Argument for Higman's Lemma\"."
flags: light-uninstall
url {
  src: "https://github.com/coq-contribs/higman-s/archive/v8.8.0.tar.gz"
  checksum: "md5=325f622153d894179fd0ce2f23478f13"
}

Lint

Command
true
Return code
0

Dry install ๐Ÿœ๏ธ

Dry install with the current Coq version:

Command
opam install -y --show-action coq-higman-s.8.8.0 coq.8.17.1
Return code
5120
Output
[NOTE] Package coq is already installed (current version is 8.17.1).
[ERROR] Package conflict!
  * No agreement on the version of ocaml:
    - (invariant) -> ocaml-base-compiler >= 5.1.1 -> ocaml = 5.1.1
    - coq-higman-s = 8.8.0 -> coq < 8.9~ -> ocaml < 4.02.0
    You can temporarily relax the switch invariant with `--update-invariant'
  * No agreement on the version of ocaml-base-compiler:
    - (invariant) -> ocaml-base-compiler >= 5.1.1
    - coq-higman-s = 8.8.0 -> coq < 8.9~ -> ocaml < 4.02.0 -> ocaml-base-compiler = 3.08.1
  * Missing dependency:
    - coq-higman-s = 8.8.0 -> coq < 8.9~ -> ocaml < 4.02.0 -> ocaml-variants >= 3.09.2 -> ocaml-beta
    unmet availability conditions: 'enable-ocaml-beta-repository'
No solution found, exiting

Dry install without Coq/switch base, to test if the problem was incompatibility with the current Coq/OCaml version:

Command
opam remove -y coq; opam install -y --show-action --unlock-base coq-higman-s.8.8.0
Return code
0

Install dependencies

Command
true
Return code
0
Duration
0 s

Install ๐Ÿš€

Command
true
Return code
0
Duration
0 s

Installation size

No files were installed.

Uninstall ๐Ÿงน

Command
true
Return code
0
Missing removes
none
Wrong removes
none